©Aline Le Bail-Kremer
Aline Le
Bail Kremer
Portrait de
Micheline Weinstein
in
Le Magazine du FSJU • N° 219
https://www.fsju.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/219_CN-WEB.pdf
Ø
Aline
Le Bail-Kreimer
Portrait
of Micheline Weinstein
Coralie Bucaille • Translator
An exceptional Woman
Micheline
Weinstein is a psychoanalyst, a profession she embodies with passion. “The only thing that ever interested me in
life”, she says. With no children nor heirs, she
decided in her will to make the FSJU (United Jewish Social Fund in France) her
legatee. A sublime gesture that reflected her absolute
intellectual spirit.
“If I speak about myself, it is only because it might perhaps be of help
to others, when it comes to its universal aspect”, she explains. But one
should not expect Micheline Weinstein to present herself to the world as a
victim, or to engage in a public and media sycophanthic performance. Why ? “Because it’s
not Jewish”, she replies, and because it might go against her professional
ethics and her conception of psychoanalysis, which is to say, against her
entire life. On the other hand, she meticulously manages a website on which every
one can browse through some of her detailed work and reflections. Imbued with
the teachings of the psychoanalysis Françoise Dolto, “she was born into it” she sums up and above all, “it was for me the discovery that we could
advance civilisation, true civilisation.”
Born
on November 15, 1941 at the Rothschild Hospital in Paris, the only medical
institution made accessible to future Jewish mothers, she was saved from the
Vel’ d’Hiv’ roundup thanks to some modest ways, non-Jewish, independent of any
organised resistance network “but
probably close to the Communist Party, at whose house I was hidden and where
the French police came to look for me on the tip-off of the concierge”. Her
“nanny” claimed that the child in the house was hers, sent the police away and
took her away immediately under a blanket. “The Polish lady living opposite, in
the courtyard, was not so lucky. She and her baby were taken away”. About her
saviours, she regrets : “I was never able to have them recognised as Righteous. Simply because I had no family reference. I didn’t know who
I was or where I came from. I didn’t really know what a human being looked like
either, apart from a strange individual whose mouth would pronounce words, I
thought then, hidden in the Jura”. As a Ward of the Nation, she obtained an
identity card at the age of 14. Of her father’s family, she found a few traces. Of her mother, none. But when Micheline chose to write
under a pseudonym, she used her mother’s first name, together with her maternal
grandmother’s surname, anglicised. Tania Bloom. From shelter to shelter, after
a long journey, she was taken in at Taverny and then at the OSE association, in
Draveil, and crossed the path of Jacqueline Lévy-Geneste who entrusted her to
Françoise Dolto. The latter became a great friend, as some of the prefaces to
her books testify. 40 years later, on the morning of Françoise Dolto’s death,
Micheline is with her.
Micheline
is now going to be 80 years old, “and for
me, it’s strange. I have no sense of time, I can say « the other day » to
evoke an event from 30 years ago. It must be said that psychoanalysts work in
the present time, session after session”. But those she loved, esteemed and
admired are now all gone, “there is no
one left. And there comes a time when one can no longer « reinvest.»”
Merciless
critic of Lacan’s shortcomings, critic of his friendships with Jung and
Heidegger deconstrucying the “mirror-stage”, one follows her through the
selected encounters of her life, such as Claude Lanzmann or Marceline Loridan-Ivens,
among thousand anecdotes - often funny, after all : isn’t the aim of an analysis “to acquire
a sense of humour and the right distance” ? - a magnificent lover, tragically swept away : encounters made all through an
authentic, sincere and passionate intellectual life. “If, after wandering from institution to institution, I chose the FSJU association
as my universal legatee, it is because it federates all the major Jewish
associations, whatever their collective and private ideologies”, she
explains, and continues: “Didn’t Freud
say that the ideology of psychoanalysis is « flesh-coloured » ? The same colour for each one of us ? That could define mine”. “In short,
my legacy, however modest, is to contribute to the urgent need to guarantee the
existence of Israel. I would like it to be directed in particular to those
Israelis affected by the endemic poverty threshold (like babies, children and
their mothers, former deportees, and more generally those of all ages affected
by indigence)”, had Micheline Weinstein first specified.
Her
itinerary, the elements of her biography are only given to us to know, only if,
“among them, some are likely to shed
light on the psyche of the direct heirs of the Shoah, and more precisely on the
psyche of the absolute orphans that the Shoah generated and, following them,
their descendants”.